Remittances as a means towards financial inclusion

Much has been said about remittances and how they in some countries constitute the second largest component of external finance after foreign direct investments.

In economic and financial literature much attention has been paid to two important points namely (1) how remittances help meet shortfalls in finances in countries and (2) how financial inclusion is a means to an end – helping channel these remittances from abroad to intended recipients; most of whom are often poor and beyond the reach of normal banking channels.

Though true the emphasis on these two points tend to miss another very important point. How remittances are a means to achieving financial inclusion for all.

Not only do these remittances flowing in from abroad provide an incentive to bring greater segments of the population under the ambit of formal financial institutions and channels as there is sufficient revenue to be gained for banking and financial institutions from channeling remittances to these recipients but they also make it possible for the recipients to gain access to formal banking channels and networks that were until recently structurally at least out of their reach. the result of this is an improvement in the lending capacity of banks and credit institutions in these countries who with greater numbers of people using their service; primarily for savings; suddenly have greater volumes of credit in their possession ; significantly enhancing their lending capability. An added impetus is provided by national and international  security considerations that look down upon informal channeling of money from abroad into domestic economies. Thus remittances by their very existence exert and demand pull to  improve formal institutional coverage to unbanked and under-banked sections of society. 

Under such scenarios remittances provide ample scope for “development” ; provided adequate policy is designed by governments and central banks to channelize the extra lending capability of formal financial  institutions; through infrastructural and policy initiatives; to help bridge the gap currently existing between demand for credit and supply of credit for particular segments of society and regions that are lagging behind. Structural change in economies to put them on to an accelerated path of development is hence a very possible consequence if remittances and their externalities are successfully harnessed. 

Need for sustainability in the quest for financial inclusion

A focus on “financial inclusion” has been there in India for quite some time now. If we look back we can see examples of policies aimed at financial inclusion at various instances in the past; most prominent amongst them being the policies that were enforced in the immediate aftermath of bank nationalization and in many subsequent policies even later. So if there existed policies for financial inclusion why it is that a vast segment of our population continue to remain outside the coverage of formal financial institutions and their products and services and continue to rely on informal sources of finances like moneylenders who charge exorbitant rates of interest.

Why it is that poverty characterizes vast tracts of rural India and people there aren’t able to use the ladder of access to alternative sources of finance to escape the clutches of poverty and the social and economic shackles that a poorly performing agricultural sector has imposed up on them. Why is it that large numbers of landless agricultural laborers AND farmers continue to be dependent on agriculture despite falling wages and incomes?

The answer to this is that though the architects of India’s poverty alleviation programs had their intentions right and realized that providing financial inclusion in the form of access to formal financial institutions and their services to the most impoverished segment of the population would help them to break away from their dependency on incomes from agriculture and also liberate them from the clutches of the moneylender (principally responsible for a large part of rural indebtedness); in implementation the “financial inclusion” did not go further than increasing the number of bank branches in rural India and emphasizing on credit requirements of the rural population; most of which again went to the land owning segments of the agricultural class who were able to muster sufficient collateral.

There was hardly any focus on providing the landless laborer with credit let alone other financial products and services including savings, insurance, etc. Thus the rural financial infrastructure that came about was quantitatively impressive but qualitatively poor.

What they forgot was that the approach towards making financial inclusion a reality needs to focus on perceiving the common man at the base of the pyramid not merely as a recipient of the financial services that institutions hand down but also as an important stake holder in the entire process; one for whom these products and services are a gateway to greater freedom from poverty and underdevelopment. The focus therefore needs to be not only on the quantitative but also on the qualitative. This poses interesting questions to us today. It forces us to ask ourselves are we providing the base of the pyramid with what they need or are we providing them with what we think they need? what difference is what we are doing making in terms of providing the base of the pyramid with a greater avenue of choices to escape the poverty and impoverishment that binds them?

It brings us to the realization that when we talk about financial inclusion we should not merely talk about the quantitative but also about the qualitative. There needs to be a focus on sustainability; on providing the base of the pyramid with access to financial services and products that are designed to help bring about transformational changes within the structure of rural society and economy that will help it escape from the clutches of poverty and grow while at the same time providing adequate protection to those making use of these products and services. The task of financial inclusion will be incomplete if the common man at the base of the pyramid, who is in a vulnerable position due to poverty and marginalization is not protected and is left even more vulnerable at the end of it.

it requires us to adapt and adopt newer systems and processes to cater to the demands of different geographical, economical and social environments with the purpose of breaking restraining forces that are inhibiting their economic development and hence fulfill the objective of achieving sustainable growth that is all inclusive.